Sentient-X
Work with agents
Give agents enough authority to help deeply without giving away accountability
Agents are a first-class interface to Sentient-X. The project connection installs a shared skill and MCP server; repository agents can also inspect code, run tests, and implement bounded changes. The best results come from specifying the outcome, boundaries, and proof.
The four-part brief
| Part | Tell the agent | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome | What should become true | “Make this episode discoverable for training.” |
| Scope | The project, task, member, or failure in bounds | “Dataset piper-cups, task revision X.” |
| Boundaries | What requires approval or must not change | “No raw deletion; no physical run; preserve wire types.” |
| Evidence | What proves completion | “Receipt, lineage query, focused test, then relevant gate.” |
Ask for action, not theater
“Inspect, implement, test, and hand back evidence” is stronger than “write a plan.” Ask for a plan only when a real choice would change scope, safety, or architecture.
A reliable agent loop
Orient
Have the agent read canonical guidance and inspect current state. For platform work, use MCP reads; for repository work, trace the real production entry point and tests.
Bound
Name spend, hardware, held-out evaluation, raw-data, compatibility, and deployment constraints before mutation.
Act
Let the agent complete routine, reversible work inside the boundary. Avoid prescribing files before it has found the owning abstraction.
Verify
Require typed receipts, exact resource identities, focused checks, and the broadest relevant gate. Let refusals stay refusals.
Handoff
Ask for the outcome first, then changed files or resources, proof, remaining risk, and the next safe action.
Prompts that scale with experience
Teach me this subsystem by tracing one real request from entry point to effect and test.
Name the canonical types and what can fail. Do not edit anything. Cite every file.Keep these decisions human
- widening task or project intent;
- spending outside the stated budget;
- admitting hardware or starting physical motion;
- promoting to production or rolling back a healthy deployment;
- weakening safety, provenance, held-out evaluation, or raw-data guarantees.
Agents can assemble the evidence and recommend an action. The accountable engineer owns these decisions.
Agents share the public contract
The hosted Improve operator and a locally connected coding agent call the same project-scoped pillar doors. Missing capability belongs at the owning API/MCP service, not in a private agent implementation.